{"id":8633,"date":"2015-08-11T04:17:00","date_gmt":"2015-08-11T04:17:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/31.28.90.232\/~denandraresan198\/2015\/08\/gast-bloggare-ankorpavift-varfor-vi\/"},"modified":"2019-03-08T20:24:37","modified_gmt":"2019-03-08T20:24:37","slug":"gast-bloggare-ankorpavift-varfor-vi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.denandraresan.com\/2015\/08\/gast-bloggare-ankorpavift-varfor-vi\/","title":{"rendered":"G\u00e4st-bloggare Ankorp\u00e5vift: Varf\u00f6r vi kallar oss anarkokapitalister"},"content":{"rendered":"
\nJag har bjudit in Ulrika fr\u00e5n den anarko-kapitalistiska bloggen Ankorp\u00e5vift<\/a> till att dela med sig av hennes briljanta artikel d\u00e4r hon f\u00f6rklarar vad det \u00e4r p\u00e5 ett l\u00e4ttf\u00f6rst\u00e5eligt s\u00e4tt. Trevlig l\u00e4sning!<\/i> I have invited Ulrika from the Swedish anarcho-capitalistic blog Ankorp\u00e5vift<\/a> to share her brilliant article where she explains what it is in way that is easy to understand. Please scroll down to the orange text for the English version!<\/em><\/div>\n
\n<\/a><\/div>\n
\n
Jag, Ulrika, kom i kontakt med id\u00e9erna kring anarkokapitalism n\u00e4r jag f\u00f6rs\u00f6kte f\u00e5 grepp om vad det moraliskt mest korrekta s\u00e4ttet \u00e4r att f\u00f6rh\u00e5lla sig till andra m\u00e4nniskor om man ser alla m\u00e4nniskor som individer med lika v\u00e4rde och lika r\u00e4ttigheter, samtidigt som det finns lika m\u00e5nga moraliska kompasser och politiska ideologier som m\u00e4nniskor vill leva efter som det finns m\u00e4nniskor p\u00e5 denna jord.
\n<\/a> Dessa funderingar gjorde att jag till slut sorterade ut ett f\u00f6rh\u00e5llningss\u00e4tt till alla andra m\u00e4nniskor som jag fann mest logiskt om man utg\u00e5r fr\u00e5n att alla m\u00e4nniskor \u00e4r lika mycket v\u00e4rda och alla har r\u00e4tt till sina \u00e5sikter och livs\u00e5sk\u00e5dningar. Detta f\u00f6rh\u00e5llningss\u00e4tt kallas icke-aggressionsprincipen och \u00e4r ett av fundamenten i den anarkokapitalistiska ideologin.<\/div>\n
\nN\u00e4sta sak som \u00e4r viktig att veta \u00e4r att b\u00e5de jag och Pontus \u00e4r vad man slarvigt kan kalla \u201cs\u00f6kare\u201d. Med det vill jag vill jag s\u00e4ga att vi vill f\u00f6rst\u00e5 de vetenskapliga drivkrafterna bakom naturen, m\u00e4nniskan och samh\u00e4llets utveckling. I och med detta f\u00f6rh\u00e5llningss\u00e4tt till v\u00e4rlden s\u00e5 letar vi st\u00e4ndigt efter att komma s\u00e5 n\u00e4ra den sanna beskrivningen av m\u00e4nniskan, v\u00e4rlden och universum som \u00e4r m\u00f6jligt. Det h\u00e4r betyder ocks\u00e5 att vi gillar att utforska v\u00e5ra st\u00e5ndpunkter och utmana v\u00e5ra egna argument genom att testa hur l\u00e5ngt man kan driva dem innan ett motargument dyker upp som \u00f6verbevisar den st\u00e5ndpunkt som vi f\u00f6r tillf\u00e4llet f\u00f6rs\u00f6ker utveckla. Det h\u00e4r betyder att inget \u00e4r f\u00f6r oss mer \u00e4n en sanning f\u00f6r stunden, f\u00f6r vi vet att den st\u00e5ndpunkt vi f\u00f6r tillf\u00e4llet h\u00e5ller f\u00f6r sann kan i n\u00e4sta stund omkullkastas om nya bevis och argument l\u00e4ggs framf\u00f6r oss. Vi str\u00e4var efter att hela tiden omv\u00e4rdera v\u00e5r uppfattning av verkligheten f\u00f6r att komma n\u00e4rmare sanningen och f\u00f6rkasta argument om de inte l\u00e4ngre h\u00e5ller f\u00f6r motargumenten.  Detta f\u00f6rh\u00e5llningss\u00e4tt till omv\u00e4rlden delar vi med m\u00e5nga andra m\u00e4nniskor som hittat till anarkokapitalismen och jag skulle med denna serie av bloggposter vilja f\u00f6rmedla mina tankar om anarkokapitalismen och f\u00f6rklara varf\u00f6r jag nu definierar mig som anarkokapitalist.<\/div>\n
\nDEL I. VAD INNEB\u00c4R DET ATT HA \u00c5SIKTER SOM \u00d6VERENSST\u00c4MMER MED ANARKOKAPITALISMEN OCH VARF\u00d6R JAG INTE R\u00d6STAR?<\/strong><\/h6>\n
\nDet var genom icke-aggressionsprincipen som jag f\u00f6rst kom i kontakt med anarkokapitalismen s\u00e5 d\u00e4rf\u00f6r vill jag b\u00f6rja med att f\u00f6rklara vad den inneb\u00e4r.<\/div>\n
\nIcke-aggressionsprincipen betyder att ingen m\u00e4nniska har r\u00e4tt att med v\u00e5ld eller tv\u00e5ng fysiskt skada n\u00e5gon annan och ej heller att med v\u00e5ld eller tv\u00e5ng tvinga p\u00e5 sin moraliska kompass om hur man ska vara som m\u00e4nniska p\u00e5 n\u00e5gon annan individ. Det betyder att du har r\u00e4tt att ha just din moraliska kompass och f\u00f6rh\u00e5llningss\u00e4tt till eventuella religi\u00f6sa, kulturella eller ideologiska st\u00e5ndpunkter utan att n\u00e5gon annan tvingar p\u00e5 dig deras syns\u00e4tt. Det betyder ocks\u00e5 att du inte har n\u00e5gon som helst r\u00e4tt att anv\u00e4nda tv\u00e5ng och v\u00e5ld f\u00f6r att tvinga ditt syns\u00e4tt p\u00e5 n\u00e5gon annan (barn \u00e4r individer ocks\u00e5, s\u00e5 detta g\u00e4ller \u00e4ven dem!). Icke-aggressionsprincipen betyder ocks\u00e5 att du har r\u00e4tt att anv\u00e4nda v\u00e5ld f\u00f6r att f\u00f6rsvara dig, men du har aldrig r\u00e4tt att initiera v\u00e5ld eller tv\u00e5ng p\u00e5 n\u00e5gon annan.<\/div>\n
\nDen andra grundstenen i anarkokapitalismen handlar om den privata \u00e4gander\u00e4tten. Den privata \u00e4gander\u00e4tten grundas i att varje m\u00e4nniska \u00e4ger sin egen kropp och produkten av sitt arbete och alla sina handlingar. Detta betyder att din kropp och vad du producerar \u00e4r din enskilda egendom som du har r\u00e4tt att f\u00f6rsvara om de uts\u00e4tts f\u00f6r hot. Det betyder ocks\u00e5 att du \u00e4ven \u00e4ger alla negativa konsekvenser av ditt arbete och handlingar och att du \u00e4r fullst\u00e4ndigt ansvarig f\u00f6r vad du g\u00f6r mot andra och du f\u00e5r d\u00e4rf\u00f6r ta alla konsekvenser av dina handlingar. Anarkokapitalismen inneb\u00e4r allts\u00e5 att ingen m\u00e4nniska har r\u00e4tt att initiera v\u00e5ld eller tv\u00e5ng mot en annan m\u00e4nniskas egendom, tankar, \u00e5sikter eller livs\u00e5sk\u00e5dning och du har r\u00e4tt att f\u00f6rsvara dig om s\u00e5 \u00e4nd\u00e5 \u00e4r fallet. Detta \u00e4r en mycket viktig slutsats som jag vill att du beh\u00e5ller n\u00e4r vi kommer till vissa moraliska dilemman i denna del och i n\u00e4stkommande delar.<\/div>\n
\nN\u00e4r jag v\u00e4l fann dessa insikter om att alla former av v\u00e5ld och tv\u00e5ng \u00e4r moraliskt f\u00f6rkastliga s\u00e5 innebar det att jag var tvungen att omv\u00e4rdera m\u00e5nga saker som i dagens l\u00e4ge anses vara normen och r\u00e5dande sanning i samh\u00e4llet och jag fick upp \u00f6gonen f\u00f6r att det finns ett b\u00e4ttre och mer konsekvent s\u00e4tt att leva med andra m\u00e4nniskor \u00e4n det system som vi har idag. Jag t\u00e4nker ge exempel p\u00e5 hur jag resonerar genom att beskriva olika fr\u00e5gor genom min anarkokapitaliska syn och j\u00e4mf\u00f6ra den med svenska partipolitiska uppfattningarna och r\u00e5dande normer. Det f\u00f6rsta jag vill g\u00f6ra \u00e4r att visa upp hur det svenska politiska systemet ser ut med en anarkokapitalistisk infallsvinkel och jag har d\u00e4rf\u00f6r tagit mig friheten att rita om den politiska skalan f\u00f6r att passa b\u00e4ttre in i det anarkokapitalistiska syns\u00e4ttet och g\u00f6ra er medvetna om att det finns andra dimensioner \u00e4n v\u00e4nster-h\u00f6gerskalan.<\/div>\n
\nSvenska politiska partier<\/a><\/p>\n
\nDe svenska politiska partierna ur en anarkokapitalistisk synvinkel.<\/strong> Det finns endast sm\u00e5 skillnader mellan partierna n\u00e4r man grupperar dem utifr\u00e5n hur mycket tv\u00e5ng och v\u00e5ld de alla f\u00f6respr\u00e5kar mot fredliga m\u00e4nniskor som inte vill leva efter deras ideal. Skillnaderna \u00e4r bara vilka delar av m\u00e4nniskors liv som de vill p\u00e5tvinga sina \u00e5sikter mer eller mindre inom. Exempelvis s\u00e5 hamnar Feministisk Initiativ, V\u00e4nsterpartiet och Sverigedemokraterna n\u00e4ra varandra p\u00e5 denna skala f\u00f6r att understryka att det inte \u00e4r n\u00e5gon skillnad mellan dessa partier annat \u00e4n i vilka fr\u00e5gor de vill ut\u00f6va v\u00e5ld och tv\u00e5ng i. Inget av partierna hamnar p\u00e5 den \u00f6vre halvan (ovanf\u00f6r den streckade linjen) d\u00e5 de alla \u00e4r f\u00f6r att anv\u00e4nda ett v\u00e5ldsmonopol f\u00f6r att begr\u00e4nsa m\u00e4nniskors frihet.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\nI min anarkokapitalistiska v\u00e4rld finns det bara en viktig m\u00e5ttstock och det \u00e4r den vertikala frihetliga-auktorit\u00e4ra skalan (se bild). Som ni ser s\u00e5 hamnar alla partier (jag har valt att ta med Feministiskt Initativ och Piratpartiet som i dagsl\u00e4get inte sitter i den svenska riksdagen) i en klump p\u00e5 nedre halvan av denna skala med sm\u00e5 skillnader mellan varandra. Det finns skillnader mellan partierna, men bara g\u00e4llande inom vilka omr\u00e5den som de vill anv\u00e4nda mer tv\u00e5ng och v\u00e5ld f\u00f6r att begr\u00e4nsa m\u00e4nniskors frihet. Vissa vill hindra migrering, andra vill inf\u00f6ra tv\u00e5ngskvotering och f\u00f6rbjuda frivilligt sexuellt utbyte mellan m\u00e4nniskor etc. Fr\u00e5n en anarkokapitalistisk synvinkel s\u00e5 spelar dessa skillnader ingen roll d\u00e5 alla partier i grunden vill anv\u00e4nda en statsapparat, det vill s\u00e4ga ett v\u00e5ldsmonopol, f\u00f6r att finansiera sin verksamhet genom att stj\u00e4la fr\u00e5n m\u00e4nniskor och sedan anv\u00e4nda v\u00e5ldsmonopolet f\u00f6r att tvinga p\u00e5 sin moral och ideologi p\u00e5 de med annan livs\u00e5sk\u00e5dning och moralisk kompass. Jag kommer ta upp fler exempel p\u00e5 detta i kommande delar, men f\u00f6r tillf\u00e4llet hoppar jag \u00f6ver det. L\u00e5t oss ist\u00e4llet prata mer om stater.<\/div>\n
\nStater har idag ett monopol p\u00e5 v\u00e5ld och tv\u00e5ng. F\u00f6r att f\u00f6rst\u00e5 det lite b\u00e4ttre s\u00e5 kommer h\u00e4r ett exempel. De flesta m\u00e4nniskor tycker inte att det \u00e4r okej att en person riktar ett vapen mot n\u00e5gon annan i syfte att ber\u00f6va en annan m\u00e4nniska p\u00e5 dennes frihet, pengar, egendom eller vad den m\u00e4nniskan anser \u00e4r livskvalit\u00e9. Detta kallas f\u00f6r st\u00f6ld och slaveri och \u00e4r f\u00f6r det flesta m\u00e4nniskor moraliskt f\u00f6rkastligt. M\u00e5nga kan se att detta h\u00e4nder i olika diktaturer idag, men det f\u00e5 inser \u00e4r att detta \u00e4r precis vad en demokratisk stat ocks\u00e5 g\u00f6r. Ist\u00e4llet f\u00f6r att en person riktar ett vapen mot sin granne f\u00f6r att tvinga in denne i sin egna livs\u00e5sk\u00e5dning, s\u00e5 kan personen  \u201cutnyttja sin r\u00f6str\u00e4tt\u201d f\u00f6r att genom v\u00e5ldsmonopolet ber\u00f6va sin granne p\u00e5 frihet, pengar, egendom och livskvalit\u00e9. Detta leder till en slutsats som man enkelt kan korta ned till att demokrati betyder bara att det \u00e4r majoriteten som f\u00f6rtrycker minoriteten och det \u00e4r d\u00e4rf\u00f6r jag kommit till slutsatsen att det \u00e4r moraliskt f\u00f6rkastligt att legitimera detta v\u00e5ldsmonopol genom att r\u00f6sta. Utnyttjar jag min r\u00f6str\u00e4tt och hamnar i den grupp som blir minoritet s\u00e5 har jag gett legitimitet att det \u00e4r okej att f\u00f6rtrycka mig och alla andra i den gruppen. R\u00f6star jag med majoriteten s\u00e5 \u00e4r jag ist\u00e4llet f\u00f6rtryckare av m\u00e4nniskorna som r\u00f6stade f\u00f6r minoritetsf\u00f6rslag och m\u00e4nniskor som av olika anledningar valde att inte r\u00f6sta. Detta \u00e4r n\u00e5got som jag inte vill g\u00f6ra d\u00e5 jag aldrig tycker det \u00e4r okej att f\u00f6rtrycka n\u00e5gon annan m\u00e4nniska. Det andra argumentet f\u00f6r att inte r\u00f6sta \u00e4r att jag inte anser det vara min r\u00e4tt att tvinga p\u00e5 min moraliska kompass, \u00e5sikter och politiska ideologi p\u00e5 n\u00e5gon annan, \u00e4ven fast andra vill g\u00f6ra det mot mig.<\/div>\n
\nJag skulle vilja avsluta med ett citat av en stark och kontroversiell kvinna:<\/div>\n
\n\u201cDen minsta minoriteten i v\u00e4rlden \u00e4r individen. De som f\u00f6rnekar individens r\u00e4ttigheter kan samtidigt inte h\u00e4vda att de \u00e4r f\u00f6rsvarare av minoriteter!<\/i>\u201d \u2013 Ayn Rand <\/div>\n
\nGillade du inl\u00e4gget? G\u00e5 in p\u00e5 Ankorp\u00e5vift<\/a> f\u00f6r att l\u00e4sa ur resten av bloggen. <\/div>\n
\nEnglish version<\/strong><\/div>\n
\nI, Ulrika, came in contact with the anarcho-capitalist ideas when I tried to get a grip on what the most morally correct way is to relate to other humans if you see all people as individuals of equal worth and with equal rights, while taking into account that there are as many moral compasses and political ideologies that people want to live according to as there are people on this earth. These thoughts lead me to a philosophy that I found most logical regarding how to relate to other people, when assuming that all people are equals and everyone has a right to their opinions and moral philosophies. The philosophy that I found is called the non-aggression principle and it is one of the foundations of the ideology called anarcho-capitalism.  <\/div>\n
\nAnother important thing to know is that both me and Pontus are what could be called \u201cseekers\u201d. By this I mean that we want to understand the scientific driving forces of nature, man and society. With our approach to the world, we are all the time looking to get as close as possible to the true description of man, human society, the world and the universe. This also means that we like to explore our positions and challenge our own arguments by testing how far we can push them before we meet a counter-argument that is able to reject the argument that we are trying to develop. This means that nothing is for us more than a truth of the moment, because we know that our current position can in the next moment  be overturned if new evidence and arguments are put before us. We share this approach to the world with many other people who found their way to anarcho-capitalism, and with this series of blog posts I would like to share my thoughts on anarcho-capitalism, and explain why I now define myself as an anarcho-capitalist.<\/div>\n
\nPART I. WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO HAVE OPINIONS THAT GO ALONG WITH ANARCHO-CAPITALISM AND WHY I DON\u2019T VOTE?<\/h6>\n
\nIt was through the non-aggression principle that I first came in contact with anarcho-capitalism, so therefore I would like to start by explaining what it means.<\/div>\n
\nThe non-aggression principle means that no person has the right to physically harm anyone else, or use force or coercion to impose their moral compass regarding how to live, upon anyone else. It means that you have the right to your own moral compass and preference of any religious, cultural and ideological positions without anyone having the right of forcing you to abandon it. It also means that you don\u2019t have any right to use force or coercion to push your views on someone else (children are individuals too, so this also applies to them!). Non-aggression principle also means that you have the right to use force to defend yourself, but you never have the right to initiate violence and coercion on anyone.<\/div>\n
\nThe non-aggression principle is a logical elongation of the other foundation of anarcho-capitalism, which is private property. The right of private property is based on every human being owning their own body and the product of all their actions. This means that your body and what you produce is your private property and that you have the right to defend your private property if someone threatens it. It also means that you own all the negative consequences of your work and actions and that you are fully responsible for what you do to others. Anarcho-capitalism means that no one has the right to initiate violence or coercion against another person\u2019s property, thoughts, opinions, or beliefs, and you have the right to defend yourself if this is the case. This is a very important conclusion that I want you to retain when we come to certain moral dilemmas in this part and the next parts.<\/div>\n
\nWhen it had become clear to me that all forms of violence and coercion is morally reprehensible, I had to re-evaluate many things that are considered to be the norm and the prevailing truth in society, and I became aware of the existence of a better and more consistent way to live with other people than the system we have today. I intend to give examples of how I reason by describing various issues through my anarcho-capitalist view and compare it with the perceptions enforced by current Swedish political parties, beliefs and societal norms. The first thing I want to do is to show what the Swedish political system looks like from an anarcho-capitalistic viewpoint, therefore I have taken the liberty to illustrate my own version of the political scale to fit in better with the anarcho-capitalistic viewpoint and make you aware of that there are other dimensions than the left-right scale.<\/div>\n
\nThe Swedish political parties from an anarcho-capitalist point of view. There is little difference between the political parties when you consider how willing they all are to initiate violent force against peaceful people who do not act as they would like. The differences are only in which parts of people<\/a><\/p>\n
\nThe Swedish political parties from an anarcho-capitalist point of view.<\/strong> There is little difference between the political parties when you consider how willing they all are to initiate violent force against peaceful people who do not act as they would like. The differences are only in which parts of people\u2019s lives that they want to impose their morals. For example, Feminist initiative, the Left Party and the Sweden Democrats are close together on this scale to emphasise that there is no difference between these parties other than the areas in which they wish to practice violence and coercion in people\u2019s lives. None of the parties end up on the top half (above the dashed line), because they are all in favor of using a monopoly of violence to limit people\u2019s freedom.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\nIn my anarcho-capitalist worldview there is only one scale that is important and that is the vertical libertarian-authoritarian scale (see picture). As you can see, all Swedish political parties (I have chosen to include Feminist Initiative and the Pirate Party as well although they are not currently represented in parliament) are in a lump on the bottom half of this scale with only small differences between them. There are differences between the political parties, but only in regards to in which areas of people\u2019s life they want to use force and violence to restrict their freedom. Some parties want to put up barriers for migration, others want to impose coercive quotas and prohibit consensual sexual exchange between people etc. However, from an anarcho-capitalistic viewpoint, these differences doesn\u2019t matter because all of the parties want to use a state apparatus, ie a monopoly of violence, in order to finance their operations by stealing from people and use the state monopoly on violence to impose their morality and ideology on the individuals that have different life philosophies and moral compasses then them.<\/div>\n
\nStates currently have a monopoly on violence and coercion. To understand this better I would like to give an example. Most people do not think it\u2019s okay for a person to point a weapon against someone else in order to deprive that person of her freedom, money, property or what that individual considers to be quality of life. This is called theft and slavery, and is for most people morally reprehensible. Many people can see that this happens in countries with dictatorship, but few people realise that this is exactly what a democratic state also does. Instead of a person aiming a weapon against her neighbor to force him into her own philosophy of life, the person can instead use her \u201cright to vote\u201d for the monopoly of force to deprive her neighbor of freedom, money, property and quality of life. This leads to a conclusion that can easily be shortened to one sentence; democracy means that it is the majority who oppresses the minority. This is why I have come to the conclusion that it is morally reprehensible to legitimise this monopoly of violence by voting. If I use my \u201cright\u201d to vote and end up in the minority, I have given legitimacy that it\u2019s okay to oppress me and everyone else in this group of minorities and if I am voting with the majority, then I become an oppressor of the people who voted for the minority proposals and people who for various reasons chose not to vote. This is something that I do not want to do because I think that it is never okay to oppress another human being. My second argument for not voting is that I do not consider it to be my right to impose my moral compass, opinions, and political ideology on someone else even though others want to do that to me.<\/div>\n
\nI would like to conclude with a quote from a strong and controversial woman:<\/div>\n
\n\u201cThe smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.\u201d \u2013 Ayn Rand<\/div>\n
\nDid you like this blog post? Go to Ankorp\u00e5vift<\/a> to read the rest of the blog.<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jag har bjudit in Ulrika fr\u00e5n den anarko-kapitalistiska bloggen Ankorp\u00e5vift till att dela med sig av hennes briljanta artikel d\u00e4r hon f\u00f6rklarar vad det \u00e4r p\u00e5 ett l\u00e4ttf\u00f6rst\u00e5eligt s\u00e4tt. Trevlig l\u00e4sning! I have invited Ulrika from the Swedish anarcho-capitalistic blog Ankorp\u00e5vift to share her brilliant article where she explains what it is in way that is […]\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[74],"tags":[2],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.denandraresan.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8633"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.denandraresan.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.denandraresan.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.denandraresan.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.denandraresan.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8633"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.denandraresan.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8633\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.denandraresan.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8633"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.denandraresan.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8633"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.denandraresan.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8633"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}